Libro de Visitas

Edwardsautt

17 Jan 2025 - 03:54 am

New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
kra26 at
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.

Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.

Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra26att.cc
kra at
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.

The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.

“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.

And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.

Mosessag

17 Jan 2025 - 03:35 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
kraken тор

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
кракен онион
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Poyhanuta

17 Jan 2025 - 03:18 am

https://savagg.com/ -
sova gg сайт


sova gg обменник

https://savagg.com/

Forrestcog

17 Jan 2025 - 02:57 am

What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.

But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
омг ссылка
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”

The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
ссылка на omg
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.

“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”

If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.

Onlinesimsp

17 Jan 2025 - 02:38 am

Good day!
Need a USA numer telefonu rental for SMS verification? Rent a reliable USA virtual phone number for secure SMS reception. Protect your personal number while verifying accounts or receiving one-time SMS codes. Rent your USA numer telefonu today and enjoy secure communication.
The service website is available at the link - https://ustimespost.com/ensure-your-privacy-use-disposable-phone-numbers-for-ultimate-data-protection
temporary virtual SMS number
Ecuador nГєmero virtual para SMS
nomor virtual WhatsApp
Turkish virtual SMS number

Wishing you luck and comfort in communication!

Itvuzygot

17 Jan 2025 - 02:18 am

Доброго!

Высшее образование и IT-сфера сегодня играют важнейшую роль в подготовке специалистов для цифровой экономики. [url=https://big-experts.ru/lobov-vadim-kak-vuzam-zanyat-lidiruyushhie-pozicii-v-it-indu-h143n/]Вадим Георгиевич Лобов выдвинул инициативу для университетов России[/url] Университет Синергия активно внедряет современные образовательные технологии, делая акцент на формировании востребованных навыков у студентов.
Особое внимание уделяется инициативам по развитию информационных технологий. Студенты осваивают искусственный интеллект, разработку программного обеспечения и анализ данных, что обеспечивает их конкурентоспособность на рынке.
Автор прогрессивных решений для IT и высшего образования, Вадим Лобов, вносит значительный вклад в интеграцию инновационных подходов. Благодаря его усилиям университет предоставляет студентам доступ к акселераторам стартапов, менторским программам и практическим кейсам, разработанным в сотрудничестве с лидерами IT-индустрии.
Этот подход позволяет выпускникам стать профессионалами нового поколения, а также способствует развитию IT-отрасли, укрепляя позиции России на глобальном технологическом рынке.

Более подробно по ссылке - https://business-common.ru/1483289-universitety-i-programmnoe-obespechenie-predlozhenie-vadim-fa6a/
Удачи!

Hermanloani

17 Jan 2025 - 02:13 am

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kra27 cc[/url]

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken зайти
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Harrymum

17 Jan 2025 - 02:10 am

Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
[url=https://kra26c.cc]кракен онион[/url]
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”

For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.

The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken ссылка
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.

And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.

Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.

Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.

His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”

Jeromemoimb

17 Jan 2025 - 01:41 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken тор[/url]

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Davidabeby

17 Jan 2025 - 01:33 am

Exporting and Sharing My Design
Once I finalized my dream kitchen layoutтАЪ exporting the design was surprisingly straightforward. The online tool offered several options; I chose to download high-resolution imagesтАЪ perfect for sharing with family and friends. The images were incredibly detailedтАЪ capturing every element of my designтАЪ from the subtle grain of the oak cabinets to the precise dimensions of the countertops. I also created a detailed PDF planтАЪ which included measurementsтАЪ appliance specificationsтАЪ and a comprehensive materials list. This was invaluable for potential contractorsтАЪ providing them with all the information they needed to accurately estimate costs and timelines. Sharing my design was incredibly easy. I emailed the images and PDF to several contractors I'd contactedтАЪ and the clarity of the visuals made communication seamless. They were all impressed by the level of detail and professionalism of the digital plans. I also shared my design on social mediaтАЪ posting the images to my Instagram account. My friends and family were amazed by the transformationтАЪ praising the modernтАЪ yet cozy feel of the kitchen. The online tool even allowed me to create a 3D walkthroughтАЪ which I shared with a friend who's considering a kitchen renovation of her own. She was particularly impressed by the realistic rendering of the lighting and the overall atmosphere of the space. The ability to easily export and share my design was a fantastic feature of the software. It facilitated clear communication with contractorsтАЪ allowed me to easily share my vision with othersтАЪ and even inspired my friend to begin her own kitchen design journey. The entire processтАЪ from initial design to final export and sharingтАЪ was smoothтАЪ efficientтАЪ and incredibly rewardingтАЪ proving that designing a dream kitchen online can be both fun and incredibly practical.




k-prom.ru

[url=https://unikavto.ru/]unikavto.ru[/url]
B5XvZR9ny
Maintaining Your Stylish Bathroom
Before I even thought about buying shelves or hanging rodsтАЪ I knew I needed a proper planтАд Armed with a measuring tape and a notebookтАЪ I meticulously documented every inch of my tiny closetтАд I measured the widthтАЪ the depthтАЪ and the heightтАЪ noting any obstructions like pipes or electrical outletsтАд This detailed assessment was crucialтАд I also carefully inventoried my belongingsтАд I pulled everything out тАУ every shirtтАЪ every pair of pantsтАЪ every scarf and shoe тАУ and sorted it into categoriesтБЪ topsтАЪ bottomsтАЪ dressesтАЪ shoesтАЪ accessoriesтАЪ etcтАд This helped me visualize the amount of space I needed for each categoryтАд Then came the fun partтБЪ sketching! I drew several different layouts in my notebookтАЪ experimenting with different shelving configurations and hanging rod placementsтАд I considered the placement of my longer dresses and coatsтАЪ and how to best utilize the vertical spaceтАд I also thought about the flow of the closet тАУ how easily I could access different itemsтАд I even considered the type of storage solutions I might need тАУ baskets for smaller itemsтАЪ drawers for folded clothesтАЪ etcтАд InitiallyтАЪ I considered custom built-insтАЪ but the cost was prohibitiveтАд ThereforeтАЪ I opted for a more budget-friendly approachтАЪ focusing on maximizing the space with readily available shelving and storage solutionsтАд My planning phase took a few eveningsтАЪ but it was worth itтАд Having a clear plan before I started shopping prevented impulsive purchases and ensured I bought the right amount of storage to perfectly fit my spaceтАд It was surprisingly satisfying to see my ideas take shape on paperтАЪ and I felt a sense of accomplishment even before IтАЩd started the actual transformationтАд